Login / Register Submit Your Article
cover
Article Menu

Journal Browser
Vol. 6 (2024)
Vol. 5 (2023)
Vol. 4 (2022)
Vol. 3 (2021)
Vol. 2 (2020)
Vol. 1 (2019)
Open Access Journal Article

Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership

by Olivia Martin 1,*
1
Olivia Martin
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
JOPEM  2021 3(1):16; https://doi.org/10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
Received: 1 January 2021 / Accepted: 21 January 2021 / Published Online: 22 February 2021
View Full-Text
Download PDF

Abstract

The paper explores the intricate gender dynamics that exist within the realm of educational leadership. It delves into how societal norms, cultural expectations, and historical contexts shape the roles, experiences, and perceptions of male and female leaders in the field of education. By examining literature on gender stereotypes, leadership theories, and empirical studies, the paper analyzes the disparities in leadership opportunities, career advancement, and recognition between genders. The discussion highlights the challenges faced by women in moving up the leadership ladder, including the glass ceiling effect, biases in promotion, and underrepresentation in decision-making positions. Additionally, the paper explores strategies for fostering gender diversity and equity in educational leadership, emphasizing the importance of mentorship, support systems, and policy changes. The findings underscore the need for a more nuanced understanding of gender dynamics to promote inclusive and effective educational leadership.

Keywords: Gender Dynamics; Educational Leadership; Leadership Theories; Gender Stereotypes; Inclusive Leadership.;
Copyright: © 2021 by Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Martin, O. (2021). Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 3(1), 16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
ACS Style
Martin, O. Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 2021, 3, 16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
AMA Style
Martin O. Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management; 2021, 3(1):16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Olivia 2021. "Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership" Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management 3, no.1:16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Martin, O. Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 2021, 3, 16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
AMA Style
Martin O. Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management; 2021, 3(1):16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, Olivia 2021. "Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership" Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management 3, no.1:16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222
APA style
Martin, O. (2021). Gender Dynamics in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 3(1), 16. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20210222

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Castañeda, R. M. (2001). Chicana Feminist thought: The basic concepts. In B. R. Solorzano & L. A. Yamauchi (Eds.), Chicana feminist thought: The basic concepts (pp. 1-17). University of Texas Press.
  3. Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the glass ceiling: Barriers and facilitators for women in leadership. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(4), 387-404.
  4. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to lead. California Management Review, 32(3), 22-52.
  5. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
  6. Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2019). Women in the labor force: A demographic perspective. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/cps/womeninthelaborforce.htm
  7. Hart, C. (1987). Women in educational administration: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(3), 225-244.
  8. Spillane, J. P. (2006). The common good and educational leadership. Teachers College Record, 108(1), 1-32.
  9. Spencer, S. J. (1999). Inside the glass ceiling: Barriers and opportunities for women in corporate leadership. New York: Oxford University Press.