Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership

by David Thomas 1,*
1
David Thomas
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 10 September 2021 / Accepted: 20 October 2021 / Published Online: 13 November 2021

Abstract

This paper explores the significance of motivational theories in shaping effective educational leadership. It delves into various motivational theories, such as Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg's Two-Factor Theory, and self-determination theory, and examines how these theories can be applied in educational settings. The study highlights the role of leaders in fostering a positive, supportive, and motivating environment that promotes student engagement and academic success. Through case studies and literature reviews, the paper demonstrates the practical application of motivational theories in curriculum development, classroom management, and professional development. It further discusses the challenges faced by educational leaders in implementing motivational strategies and suggests ways to overcome these obstacles. The analysis reveals that a well-understood and effectively applied motivational framework can significantly enhance the leadership skills of educators, ultimately leading to improved student outcomes.


Copyright: © 2021 by Thomas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Thomas, D. (2021). Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 3(2), 24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113
ACS Style
Thomas, D. Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 2021, 3, 24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113
AMA Style
Thomas D. Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management; 2021, 3(2):24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, David 2021. "Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership" Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management 3, no.2:24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Thomas, D. Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 2021, 3, 24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113
AMA Style
Thomas D. Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management; 2021, 3(2):24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113
Chicago/Turabian Style
Thomas, David 2021. "Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership" Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management 3, no.2:24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113
APA style
Thomas, D. (2021). Motivational Theories and Their Application in Educational Leadership. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 3(2), 24. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20211113

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Amabile, T. M. (1975). The psychology of creativity. New York: Westview Press.
  3. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
  4. Fullan, M. G. (2001). The new meaning of educational change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  5. Gagné, M. F., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
  6. Harter, J., & Otten, R. (2006). The relationship between self-actualization and student engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 35(4), 445-455.
  7. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  8. Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for character. New York: Bantam Books.
  9. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1968). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Psychological Bulletin, 70(9), 407-419.
  10. Luthans, F., Avolio, B. J., & Biesenthal, L. C. (2003). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Leadership Studies, 8(3), 101-118.
  11. Noe, R. A., Schmitt, N. K., & Cinque, R. M. (1982). The role of satisfaction as a determinant of teacher turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(4), 652-656.
  12. Ryan, R. M., Deci, E. L., & Grolnick, W. S. (2000). Intrinsic motivation and educational achievement: A self-determination theory perspective. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
  13. Schunk, D. H., & Meece, J. L. (1981). Expectancy-theory of achievement motivation. In K.ren & M. L. Halleck (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 2, pp. 71-105). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  14. Stipek, D. (1996). Motivation to learn: The influence of students, teachers, and the classroom environment. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
  15. Vansteenkiste, M., Luyckx, K., Soenens, B., & Ryan, R. M. (2006). In search of the motivational bases of self-determination theory: The role of autonomy and competence. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 30-67.
  16. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. New York: Wiley.