Journal Browser
Open Access Journal Article

Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making

by James Martin 1,*
1
James Martin
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 September 2022 / Accepted: 20 October 2022 / Published Online: 12 November 2022

Abstract

This paper examines the intersection of psychological theories and educational policy making, highlighting the critical role that psychological insights play in shaping effective educational policies. The discussion begins by outlining the fundamental principles of educational policy and their objectives, emphasizing the need for policy to reflect the developmental and learning needs of diverse student populations. Drawing from psychological perspectives, such as social cognitive theory, attachment theory, and motivation theory, the paper analyzes how these frameworks can inform policy decisions. It explores the implications of understanding student motivation, the importance of fostering positive teacher-student relationships, and the impact of educational environments on cognitive development. Furthermore, the paper discusses the challenges of implementing evidence-based policies and the need for ongoing evaluation to ensure that psychological considerations are integrated into policy making. The conclusion underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to educational policy, where psychological knowledge serves as a foundational element in creating inclusive, supportive, and effective educational systems.


Copyright: © 2022 by Martin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) (Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
Cite This Paper
APA Style
Martin, J. (2022). Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 4(2), 34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112
ACS Style
Martin, J. Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 2022, 4, 34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112
AMA Style
Martin J. Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management; 2022, 4(2):34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, James 2022. "Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making" Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management 4, no.2:34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112

Share and Cite

ACS Style
Martin, J. Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 2022, 4, 34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112
AMA Style
Martin J. Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management; 2022, 4(2):34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112
Chicago/Turabian Style
Martin, James 2022. "Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making" Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management 4, no.2:34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112
APA style
Martin, J. (2022). Psychological Perspectives on Educational Policy Making. Journal of Organizational Psychology and Educational Management, 4(2), 34. doi:10.69610/j.jopem.20221112

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

References

  1. Burbules, N. C., & Callister, T. A. (2000). Watch IT: The Risks and Promises of Information Technologies for Education. Westview Press.
  2. Elmore, R. (1996). Improving Student Learning: The Contribution of School, Family, and Community. Jossey-Bass.
  3. Shavit, Y., & Sahlberg, P. (2007). National Policies and Educational Change: Comparative Studies of Finland, South Korea, and the United States. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  4. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. Freeman.
  5. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn and Succeed. Theory into Practice, 43(2), 82-88.
  6. Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss: Volume 1: Attachment. Basic Books.
  7. Roeser, R. W., & Gibb, B. E. (2002). Attachment and classroom behavior: Are teachers the ones who matter? Journal of Early Childhood Research, 1(1), 37-52.
  8. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The "What" and "Why" of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
  9. Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychology: An Introduction. American Psychologist, 55(1), 5-14.
  10. Hattie, J., & Marsh, H. W. (2007). The relationship between teacher and student learning. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 89-128.
  11. Blackman, T. B., & Shadish, W. R. (2002). The role of program evaluation in improving education policy and practice. In S. M. DeVries (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of evaluation (pp. 331-354). Sage Publications.